<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thinkfuture &#187; techcrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkfuture.com/wp/index.php/tag/techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkfuture.com/wp</link>
	<description>the blog of hellofuture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Techcrunch50 &#8211; No Disruptive Innovation&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://thinkfuture.com/wp/index.php/2009/09/16/techcrunch50-no-disruptive-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkfuture.com/wp/index.php/2009/09/16/techcrunch50-no-disruptive-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kalaboukis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tc50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkfuture.wordpress.com/?p=2007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I just spent a few days watching the Techcrunch 50 conference, where a number of startups present their ideas for cash, prizes and review from both a panel of judges, VCs, media and the public. Supposedly, these companies are supposed to be the &#8220;cream of the crop&#8221; when it comes to new, interesting and profitable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spent a few days watching the Techcrunch 50 conference, where a number of startups present their ideas for cash, prizes and review from both a panel of judges, VCs, media and the public. Supposedly, these companies are supposed to be the &#8220;cream of the crop&#8221; when it comes to new, interesting and profitable ideas.</p>
<p>As I was watching startup after startup take to the stage and present themselves, I really saw nothing really new, disruptive and innovative. Now you are probably saying, dude, who are you to do this? I&#8217;ve worked in innovation most of my life, and I make it my business to blody go and seek new, disruptive ideas. Nothing I saw at Techcrunch 50 was like that.</p>
<p>A few came close, but the reality is, a lot of what was presented had been done before, and unsuccessfully. Maybe the time right right now for a barter exchange for startups (<a href="http://theswop.com" target="_blank">theswop.com</a>), or a way to find a decent local service provider (<a href="http://redbeacon.com" target="_blank">redbeacon.com</a>) or a online therapist (<a href="http://breakthrough.com" target="_blank">breakthrough.com</a>). But I had this sense of deja vu. Nothing I saw was really cool, interesting, or even all that exciting.</p>
<p>Is the real innovation hidden away in the meeting rooms of VCs? Is the real disruptive stuff so wildly innovative that they won&#8217;t go to a public forum like Techcrunch 50? If that were the case, you&#8217;d think maybe 1 or 2 would have founders bold enough to expose it there.</p>
<p>I guess not. While I saw myself saying &#8220;I&#8217;d use that&#8221; I don&#8217;t think I ever said &#8220;I&#8217;d pay for that&#8221;. And that&#8217;s the key, right there, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkfuture.com/wp/index.php/2009/09/16/techcrunch50-no-disruptive-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

